More buying research now ends in one AI-written answer from ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google, with no list of links. We make your site a source those answers quote, built on real SEO, not vapour.
Free review · Covers classic SEO and AI visibility together
Brands our teams have delivered for
PixelCrayons' AI SEO service makes your content findable and citable by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google's AI Overviews. It runs as one practice with three lanes: AEO, GEO and AI Overviews. The work is structured data, answer-first content, entity cleanup and crawler access, and it compounds with classic SEO. We work direct for brands and white-label for agencies.
Outcomes tied to real engagements, not averages.
Schema coverage (the structured data that tells engines what a page is) across your money pages: Organization, Service, FAQ, Article, Product where it applies, validated, not just present. Engines cite what they can parse without guessing; markup is how you stop making them guess.
Every important page restructured so its core answer is quotable in isolation: a direct-answer block up top, question-form headings, tables where a table is the right format. The same structure that wins featured snippets is what AI models lift into answers.
Who you are, what you do, where you operate: stated consistently across your site, your profiles and the databases engines actually read. Ambiguous entities get paraphrased into competitors' answers; clear ones get named.
GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and Google-Extended checked against your robots rules, CDN settings and firewall. Many sites block AI crawlers by accident and wonder why they're invisible. We verify access before optimising anything.
AI-referral traffic where analytics can see it, citation spot-checks on your money queries across the major engines, and classic rank tracking beside them, reported together, with the measurement gaps named rather than papered over. This field is young. Anyone promising precise 'AI share of voice' is selling confidence, not data.
It's the name the market landed on for a real shift. Here's what it is, and what it isn't.
If an agency pitches LLM SEO as separate from your SEO, a second retainer on a parallel roadmap, you are being sold the same work twice, or something imaginary once. LLM SEO (being found, understood and cited by large language models) is the newest label for the work this page describes. The shift is real: when a buyer asks ChatGPT or Gemini to recommend a platform, the model composes one answer from sources it trusts, and absence from it is invisible in a way page-two rankings never were.
There is no secret channel into a model's training data, no submission form, no meta tag. What moves citation is unglamorous: content direct enough to quote, markup that removes ambiguity about who is speaking, an entity footprint consistent enough to trust, and crawler access so the retrieval layer can reach you. That is LLM SEO. We fold it into one programme because that is what it is.
We sign an NDA and talk through your money queries and the AI engines your buyers use.
The visibility audit checks citations, crawler access, schema, entities and classic rankings. We confirm the date your proposal arrives: a prioritised roadmap, itemised and priced.
You confirm the scope, the payment and the access we need. Nothing starts before this.
Crawler access is fixed first, then schema coverage on money pages and direct-answer blocks on the pages buyers ask about.
Answer-first content on a calendar and entity work across your footprint, with weekly reports on citations observed, AI-referral traffic and classic rankings.
Prism is the client workspace where your requests, approvals, tasks and weekly reviews live.
Where the engagement includes it, your search programme runs in a Prism workspace you log into: the fix queue, the content queue, approvals and the weekly review, with each decision written down as it is made.
Approvals with an owner and a due date.
Each decision written down as it is made.
What we did and what happened, side by side.
Topical authority plus AEO architecture (schema, answer-first content, entity cleanup) took a UK SaaS brand from absent to cited in AI Overviews on the queries its sales team actually cares about. The same build lifted classic organic traffic alongside, because the fundamentals are shared.
Three organic lanes, one paid: AEO for engines that cite sources, GEO for engines that synthesise answers, AI Overviews for Google's layer, and AI Platform Ads wherever a platform sells ad space. Not sure which lane? The audit below says. Start with the AI visibility audit guide to record repeatable conditions and distinguish mentions, citations and recommendations.
Founder & CEO
An entrepreneur at heart who connects business analysis, strategy, clear objectives and ROI with practical technology solutions.
LinkedIn →
Technical Manager
Brings technical delivery, client communication and project management together so work moves from brief to release smoothly.
LinkedIn →Every engagement
Know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue.
All engagements. Roles may be combined and vary with your engagement.
Each one says where it applies and links to its full terms.
We typically respond within four business hours. Eligible engagements can typically start within two to three business days after scope, payment and required access are confirmed.
Business hours are Monday to Friday, 9:00 am to 6:00 pm IST, excluding published company holidays. Typical expectations, not guaranteed service levels.
Full termsYour materials remain yours. Bespoke deliverable rights, licences and handover are agreed before work starts.
All engagements.
Full termsKnow who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue.
All engagements. Roles may be combined and vary with your engagement.
Full termsNo. Search engines decide rankings, and we do not guarantee rankings, AI-search citations, leads or revenue. We agree the work, how progress will be measured and how often we report it, and we explain what the measures show and what we will change next.
Before work starts we agree how often you get updates, what the reports cover and who sends them. You know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue. For hourly and retainer work, time is recorded in Workstatus, so you can see the time records behind your invoice.
Your materials, data and accounts remain yours, and we prefer to work in advertising and analytics accounts you own, with access delegated to our team. Agreed ownership rights in bespoke deliverables transfer under the engagement terms and applicable payment; third-party software and assets keep their licences. We do not withhold customer-owned data or accounts over a payment dispute.
Cancellation, notice and any renewal terms are written into your proposal or statement of work before you accept it. If an engagement ends early, we hand over completed, paid-for work and list any unfinished work separately. For an eligible specialist trial, you can stop within the trial window and pay nothing for eligible trial hours.
How we handle claims, credentials and your data: group credentials, dated ratings, how case figures are signed off, client permissions and data handling.
The practice runs three organic lanes and one paid. Which one leads depends on what the visibility audit finds, and sometimes the honest answer is that classic SEO comes first. This is how we route the findings.
| What the audit finds | Where we start | Why |
|---|---|---|
| AI crawlers blocked by robots rules, CDN settings or the firewall | Crawler access, before anything else | Many sites block GPTBot, ClaudeBot or PerplexityBot by accident. Nothing can be cited until the engines can reach the page. |
| Weak crawl, index or authority fundamentals | Classic SEO first | A site with weak fundamentals cannot be AI optimised on top. Engines cite sources they can crawl, parse and trust. |
| Buyers ask ChatGPT or Perplexity, which cite sources | AEO | Answer engines quote pages directly, so answer-first formatting, schema and entity work on your own pages lead. |
| Your Google queries show an AI Overview above the results | AI Overviews | The levers are Google's own: index eligibility, snippet controls, citable passages and the rankings Overviews draw on. |
| Gemini, Copilot or Claude describe you vaguely, or not at all | GEO | Generative engines synthesise from the wider web, so entity consistency across profiles, press and directories comes first. |
| A platform sells ad space inside its answers | AI Platform Ads | Paid placement inside AI assistants, run with the same discipline as search. |
Each audit finding is marked classic, AI or both, so you can see how much of the AI work your existing SEO already covers before paying for any of it.
The work that makes your content findable, parsable and citable by AI engines: structured data, answer-first content, entity clarity and crawler access, layered onto classic SEO. We run it as one practice with three lanes: AEO for answer engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, GEO for generative engines and AI Overviews for Google's AI layer.
It's an extension, not a replacement: engines cite sources they can crawl, parse and trust, which SEO has always built. What changes is that you're competing to be the source an engine quotes, which rewards direct answers, clear markup and entity consistency. The audit marks each finding classic, AI or both, so you see the overlap before paying.
No, and treat anyone who says yes as a red flag. Nobody outside these companies controls what their models cite, and engines change retrieval behaviour without notice. We commit contractually to the work that makes citation likely (access, structure, entities, quotable answers) and to measuring where you appear, with the gaps named.
Three ways, each with its limits named. AI-referral traffic in analytics is real but undercounted, citation spot-checks on your priority queries are a sample rather than a census, and classic rankings remain the best proxy for the authority engines draw on. Weekly reports show all three, and we won't invent an 'AI visibility score'.
Once we have a complete brief, we confirm when your proposal arrives. Eligible engagements can typically start two to three business days after scope, payment and required access are confirmed. Crawler access and schema on money pages come first, and content and entity work build from there on a monthly cycle.
Yes. Wherever you are, you know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue. The practice is fully available to India-based companies as well: we're headquartered in Noida.
Yes, the whole practice ships under partner agencies' brands: your reporting templates and client calls, our delivery, NDA-backed. We don't approach the clients you introduce to us for direct business, through the work and for twelve months after the last assignment for that client ends. It's one of the additions partners request most.
One practice for being cited in AI answers (AEO, GEO and Google AI Overviews), priced as a foundations sprint, a monthly programme, or per page for teams that run their own SEO; the visibility audit stays free, and nothing here promises a citation.
Indicative: every figure is refined into an itemised proposal.INR figures shown excl. GST.
How firms compare
Best AI SEO Agencies (AEO and GEO) (October 2026) · Top AI SEO Companies in India (AEO and GEO) (October 2026), scored on public evidence by the PixelCrayons Index, ourselves included.
The audit checks what the engines can crawl, parse and cite today: classic SEO and AI visibility in one pass. If the honest answer is that your fundamentals need work first, the audit says that too.
Free review · No retainer required · NDA standard
Last updated
